Parliamentary Committee
supports removing control of Defence Ministry over Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT)
Agreeing
with the proposal that the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) should not function
under the Ministry of Defence (MoD), the Parliamentary Standing Committee on
Defence in its 18th Report submitted this month has recommended that
placing AFT under the Ministry of Law and Justice would go a long way in
building a strong and independent institution.
It
may be recalled that the Punjab & Haryana High Court in its decision in the
Public Interest Litigation titled Maj Navdeep Singh Vs Union of India has
already directed that the AFT should be placed under the Law Ministry and not
the MoD to ensure independence and that keeping in view the separation of
powers enshrined in the constitution, government should have minimal say in its
functioning.
Deposing
before the Parliamentary committee, all witnesses vouched for shifting of AFT
from the purview of MoD. The Indian Ex-Services League (IESL) was of the view
that the situation was subjective since AFT was to comment on the actions of
the MoD itself. Col Satwant Singh opined that control should not be with MoD so
that AFT can render judgements fearlessly without bias and without worrying
about loss of hidden perks. Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice also informed
the committee that the Department of Justice had already mooted establishment
of a ‘Central Tribunals Division’. Another representative of the Law Ministry
informed the committee that MoD did not want to leave control over AFT and the
Defence Ministry is also filing appeals in almost each and every matter decided
by AFT.
The
Defence Services and Department of Ex-Servicemen welfare (DESW) have expressed
reservation on grant of civil contempt powers to AFT while the Defence and Law
Ministries have fully supported such powers. Experts associated with the issue
have also expressed shock over the brazen manner in which DESW has stated
before the committee that AFTs cannot disregard govt policy and that is the
reason why decisions of AFT are not implemented. The Defence Secretary’s stand
however has been appreciated wherein he has stated on record that challenging
any authority is a fundamental right of every individual, whether he is in
service or retired and he has to be provided reasonable opportunity to air
grievances.
No comments:
Post a Comment